Coincidental Genealogy ?

In continuing my study in Genesis Chapter 4, I stopped to ponder the genealogyE529EA72-830F-41DA-9943-AAD0E2A3305A mentioned at the end of Chapter 4 and the beginning of Chapter 5 of Genesis.  I wonder if I just have a curious mind or if anyone else notices the incredible similarities between the names in the genealogy of Cain and the genealogy of Seth. They were brothers, but we know Cain was sent away for murdering his other brother, Abel.  So they didn’t live near each other.  And in describing the genealogy, the Bible does something very interesting, and I just couldn’t resist writing about it.

So first off, let me give you an initial visual before I show the oddities:

 

Cain’s descendants                                    Seth’s descendants

Enoch.                                                         Enosh

Irad.                                                              Kenan

Mehujael.                                                    Mahalel

Methushael.                                                Jared

Lamech.                                                       Enoch

.                                                                      Methusela

.                                                                       Lamech

.                                                                        Noah

So first I thought it was odd that the writer of Genesis goes into great detail to show how old Seth and his descendants were at the time they had a son, but does not indicated how much time elapsed between Cain and his descendants.  I also noticed the similarities in the names.  We see Cain had Enoch, Seth had Enosh – different by only one letter.  Then in Cain’s line we see Mehujael, while Seth’s line had Mahalel – close isn’t it?  Then we see on Cain’s side Methushael and on Seth’s side Methusela – again very close.  Both sides had a Lamech.  So of course my curious brain kept wondering.

As I continued to look, I couldn’t help but wonder if the writer of Genesis got it correct.  The spellings are so incredibly close that it is either a huge coincidence, error, or God wants us to see something.   But the oddities didn’t stop there.

If I take off the first four names on Seth’s side and start with Enoch and match up both sides like that, it gets even weirder.  You have this:

Cain’s side                    Seth’s side

Enoch                         Enoch

Irad                            Methusela

Methushael              Lamech

Lamech

If I eliminate Irad from Cain’s side then we have:

Enoch.                        Enoch

Methushael.             Methusela

Lamech.                     Lamech

Furthermore, in Cain’s geneology after Lamech it states Lamech had three sons and one daughter.  Odd, isn’t it that they list the daughter?  Her name was Naamah and guess what the name of the descendant on Seth’s side from Lamech was?  Noah.  So here we have:

Enoch.                       Enoch

Methushael.             Methusela

Lamech.                    Lamech

Naamah.                  Noah

So, since the writer did not mention the time lapse on Cain’s side, we have no idea if the time lines match up or not, but the oddity is too much for me to overlook.   Why are the names on both sides so similar?  Why did the writer include a time line for one and not the other? Why did they mention the daughter?  What was her importance? They did not consider women as heirs,  so why list her?  She obviously was well known for something or she would not have made it to the Bible. But, we do know that Noah, the last in our list here for Seth’s descendants, would go on to save the animals and a few human beings from the flood.

So in conclusion, this could all be coincidence or it could have a greater importance that God wants us to examine.  I just know one thing, the Bible is amazing and every time I think that there is nothing new there, I see something like this!

Lamech’s arrogance

Lamech, a fifth generation of Cain’s dependents, (if I have counted correctly) follows the same pattern of ungodliness as Cain did.  There is so much to discover about Lamech that the six verses he is mentioned in the Bible almost make him seem like a “passover reading”, so to speak. But his fifteen minutes of fame have a lot to show us.

Genesis chapter 4 verse 19 begins with the phrase, “Lamech married two women…”. Okay, let’s start there because it caused me to wonder when did the marrying of multiple women come into existence?  It wasn’t as though one of his wives had died and the other was the second wife – verse 23 disputes that fact.  So it is stated as if the marrying of more than one woman had been a practice for a while because the writer of Genesis never comments on it other than to say “Lamech married two women” – sort of nonchalantly.   So logically,  somewhere between Cain “laying with his wife (singular)” in verse 17 and Lamech being married to two women in verse 19, life on the earth had changed quite drastically from God’s original plan of one man and one woman, as in Adam and Eve.  Now this “marrying of more than one woman” might not have been the practice every where on earth at the time, but it was certainly the practice in the Cainite civilization and the city of Enoch, which Cain had built.

And so we see that Lamech called his wives together in verse 23 and explains to them that he, like his ancestor Cain, is also a murderer.  He states, “I have killed a man for wounding me, a young man for injuring me.”  The Bible doesn’t tell us what type of “wound” it was.  Maybe it was a territorial argument and a physical fight.  Maybe it was a financial wound in that the “young man” stole a piece of property owned by Lamech, like a sheep or something.  The two important things here are that the man was “young” and Lamech had a foul temper – a temper so foul that instead of dealing with a situation as an adult, he resorted to murder and hatred for another human being – very similar to Cain.  And was the young man a teenager?  The writer made special note that it was a young man not an adult man.  Was the penalty for killing a “young man” different during those times?  I don’t know.

It is also important to make you aware that he told his wives about it.  Doesn’t it make you wonder why?  Men during those days did not value a woman’s opinion, nor were women treated like anything other than property and baby machines.  So isn’t it curious that he tells his wives about his crime? It is almost as if he is running or hiding in a way, like, “Quick come here, I have to tell you this before anyone else shows up or finds out.”  Was he expecting his wives to cover for him in some way?  Was he going to run away and he needed to tell them before he left?  We can only wonder.

But it is his arrogance in the next verse, verse 24, that I find incredible.  He states, “If Cain is avenged seven times, then Lamech seventy-seven times.”  So first off, we are aware that God had placed a mark on Cain after Cain had killed Abel and God was sending him away so that if anyone attempted to kill Cain, then they would suffer vengeance seven times over – a vengeance decreed from Almighty God.  But at this point in the Bible when Lamech makes his statement, we are unaware of anyone who attempted to harm Cain, and furthermore, the knowledge of this “vengeance” had been passed down through multiple generations because Lamech knew of it.  Maybe the noticeable mark on Cain was a physical marking that somehow set him apart from the others and so when people talked about why Cain was different it became known what he had done to his brother Abel and the vengeance decreed against anyone who tried to “avenge” Abel’s blood.   Again, we do not know.  All we know is that Lamech knows about the vengeance if anyone were to harm Cain because Lamech mentions it in his statement to his wives. B124624A-3D36-45A7-9CE8-43E4CE051902

But here Lamech thinks that his own sin of murder isn’t possibly as bad as Cain’s and therefore he (Lamech) should have more vengeance if someone tries to harm him because of his sin.  Basically, he is saying, “Listen my wives.  While it is true I did something bad, it wasn’t nearly as bad as what Cain did.  I was JUSTIFIED because that man injured me, whereas Cain killed Abel when Abel did nothing to him to deserve it.  The man I killed deserved it.”  Doesn’t it amaze you how he tries to justify his sin of murder and make himself out to be the victim in the situation? And doesn’t it amaze you how he feels that he is worthy to pass judgement on anyone who tries to harm him because of his sin?

It is of further curiosity to see how the writer of Genesis leaves the story there.  He mentions it and then nothing further is noted.  Why even mention it?  It had to have some importance if it were to be mentioned and included in the Bible.  I think the lessons here are to show us that civilization had continued to degrade into a downward sinful spiral.  That only five generations removed from the first-born child of Adam and Eve,  man had continued to disregard God and HIS laws.  It also shows us that man had no reverence for God in that man thought he could place himself into the righteous seat of God and invoke a binding punishment on his fellow man.

We never hear from Lamech again, nor do we know what happened to him.  I do know this, however.  Lamech eventually died, whether by the hands of another or by natural causes.  Lamech’s sin will be judged and he will be held to account by the only One who can pronounce judgement – God – and this God sees all and saw the truth to what Lamech had done – just as He does with us.

 

The Mystery of Cain’s Wife

Have you ever wondered where Cain’s wife came from?  Have you, like me, sat thru church services listening to different explanations for her existence but you never quite agreed?  I have given over a month’s time in thought to this.  After studying the Bible passages over and over, I finally think I have come to a conclusion that makes more sense to me than what I have heard before.E0280621-3D8F-4445-8710-754476216464

Chapter 4 of Genesis states that “Adam lay with his wife Eve, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Cain. ….Later she gave birth to his brother Abel.”  I believe there is one word here that is the most important word to understanding this mystery.  The word LATER…… ‘LATER she gave birth to his brother Abel.’

We have all been taught to believe that there was ONLY Adam, Eve, Cain, and Abel.  But the Bible is not definitive in that assumption.  It is entirely possible that there was a great span of time between Cain and Abel.  The Bible NEVER states that there were no children born between Cain and Abel.  It simply states, Eve had Cain and later she had Abel.  It does not tell us how much LATER that was.  Maybe it was 400 years later. There is no way to know.

What I do know is that even God acknowledged that there were others around when in verse 15 of Chapter 4 He states, “Not so; if ANYONE kills Cain, he will suffer vengeance seven times over.  And so the Lord put a mark on Cain so that NO ONE who found him would kill him.”  So logic then leads me to believe if there were no other human beings on the earth at that time, this conversation between God and Cain would not have taken place.  The only people around to kill Cain under that assumption would have been his parents, Adam and Eve.  So that simply cannot be the case.  There were others, and the only way for the others to come into existence would have been thru Adam and Eve and then for those offspring to continue to have offspring.  And hence we have a pool of people from which the wife of Cain would come from. So therefore those facts lead me to believe that the wife of Cain was a relative – maybe a sister or a niece or a cousin.

The other way I can justify my reasoning is if I look into Chapter 5 of Genesis and follow the family line of any of the people listed you can see that the Bible only picks out certain individuals at certain times.  For example, Seth was 105 years old when he became the father of Enoch.  Do you honestly believe that Seth didn’t have ANY children prior to being 105 years old?   The Bible is only listing the person in Seth’s line that would eventually lead to the birth of Christ.  Just as the only two “important” children of Adam and Eve that would make it to the Bible were Cain and Abel even though we know from the Bible that there were other children born to them, because it states they had “other sons and daughters”, but you don’t know anything about them because they were not the focus for the information that God wanted to reveal to us thru His word.

So Cain’s wife is not really a mystery.  The bigger mystery to me is who would have agreed to marry him knowing he was a murderer and had some kind of a “mark” that would designate him as such.

 

 

 

 

Saying Goodbye to Adam and Eve

Adam and Eve, the Father and the Mother of all who live, are best known for their time in the Garden of Eden when they went against God’s command and ate from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil and were ultimately banished from the perfect environment which God had created for them.

The last we hear of Adam actually physically speaking was when he was blaming both God and Eve for his fall from grace.  But we know that Adam was around for a while because the book of Genesis gives us the genealogy of Adam’s line, and it starts when Adam was 130 years old.  This is the time he became the father of Seth.  Seth is the lineage thru which the Messiah would eventually come.  So from creation to the fall, we know of Adam, and then nothing about him is recorded until he was the father of Seth, and then nothing afterward. No other life events are recorded for the first man that was ever created!  However, Adam lived 930 years!  Isn’t it interesting that he is never again mentioned after the birth of Seth?  Surely the very first man to ever be created had more of an impact than just having one son mentioned in the genealogy!  Don’t you think the men and women of that time would have been asking what it was like in the Garden or what it was like to walk and talk with God?  Don’t you think he would have been like the old wise man we see portrayed in movies where people go to seek his wisdom and advice?  But nothing is ever mentioned about him again – this very first man to be created in the image of God!

Eve, on the other hand, we hear speak after her discussion in the Garden with God.  We hear her speak again when she says, “God has granted me another child in the place of Abel, since Cain killed him.”  So we know a few things about her.  We know that Eve knew full well what crime her other son had committed, because she acknowledges it .  And like any mother she would have been mourning and would have been devastated to have lost a child, especially at the hands of the other child.  We know that Cain was sent away from her also and so, in effect, she lost both her sons.  But we never see anything written about her sorrow.  We never see Cain coming back to see his mother while she was living or even at her death.  How sorrowful that must have been for Eve.  But we don’t see that recorded.  We just see that she is happy that she has been given another male child, Seth.  In addition,  the Bible never tells us how long Eve lived.  It never tells us anything else about her except, in the genealogy mentioned in the previous paragraph,  it states that Adam had more sons and daughters.  So the assumption here is that he had them with Eve, but that is not exactly stated.  Eve could have died many years before.  I find it odd also that the mother of all creation is never noted to have contributed anything except to give birth to Cain, Abel, and Seth.  Even her “other sons and daughters” are never mentioned by name.

However, Adam and Eve will always and ever be the only two creations made specifically by the hands of God.  They would be the only two creations to live in the “perfect world”.  The only two creations to hear a creature or creatures speak.  The only two creations  to know what it was like to live with the lions and the lambs together in harmony – an event that would never be again on this earth.   The only two to know exactly what the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil and the Tree of Life looked like.  The only two to know what it was like living in a sinless world for a time.

04A5FB3C-30E8-4FFB-B9CC-0C323931F314Adam and Eve may not have any further recorded history in the Bible beyond the birth of Seth, and as we say goodbye to them here, we know they contributed so much more to that time period and even into today than is ever spoken of.

 

The Human-Like Presence of God

Most people tend to think of God as some “Father Time” being that is portrayed on television – kind of like an old man with a long white beard, a long white robe, and a staff.   Or sometimes they think of Him as a Spirit type being that is incomprehensible to the human mind.  Regardless of how you picture God, did you know God was very active and physically present in a human type of way in the book of Genesis?

From the very beginning of the book, we see God speaking when He says, “Let there be light.”  And God spoke again when He gave a direct command to Adam not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.  His speaking was an audible sound.  Audible enough for Adam to hear it and, in some form of language, to communicate His purpose.  What language did He speak?  Only God knows.  But God had to also physically show the tree to Adam.  How would Adam have known one tree from another?  The Bible says the trees were “pleasing to the eye and desirable for food”, so God had to point out the “bad” tree to Adam in order to help him to understand which one he should stay away from.  God couldn’t hold Adam accountable for something he would not have known.  So I fully believe that there was a taking to and a showing of the tree, which indicates an intimate human type of interaction.

Later in Chapter One and then in Chapter 2, we see God creating and “operating”, so to speak,  on Adam when he takes a rib from him to create Eve.  How did he cause a deep sleep to come upon Adam?  Was it induced by some type of medicinal plant?  Was it supernatural?  The Bible doesn’t tell us.  But it does say, “and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man’s ribs and closed up the place with flesh.”  So it is a physical type of surgery.  And it is a surgery that Adam knew about.  He didnt’ just wake up and there was the woman and he went on with his day.  Adam is noted as saying, “she is now bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh.”  Indicating that he knew full well what had occurred.  So either God told Adam ahead of time what He was doing, or after Adam awoke and saw the woman, God must have told him what had occurred.  Either way, God is the “surgeon and creator” here, another intimate type of human- like interaction with His creation.

Then, in Chapter 3, we see God walking in the garden.  We know He was physically walking because the Bible states “the man and his wife heard the sound of the Lord God as he was walking.”  In order to hear something, two surfaces must come into contact.  So maybe it was God walking against the brush, or stepping on a twig.  Again the Bible is not clear on how they heard Him, it just says, they “heard him walking in the Garden in the cool of the evening.”  So God was in a physical type of form walking to find Adam to have a personal conversation with him.

Later in Chapter three, we see God making garments for Adam and Eve, which means he had to put to death an animal or two in order to use their skins for clothing.  How did he do that?  Did he physically kill the animal, or simply cause it’s heart to stop beating?  The Bible, again, doesn’t tell us. But God had to kill the animal, skin the animal, dry the skins, in order to use the skins.  He didn’t simply wrap Adam and Eve in the bloody hide of the animal He had just killed.  This was a process.  So here we see God in a laborer type of role.

So, you are probably asking yourself, what is the purpose of these examples?  The examples are here to show the intimate type of relationship that man once had with God, to show that God walked and talked with man.  To also show that God created man for His pleasure, and He desired to be with His creation.  But because of man’s sin, God could no longer physically dwell with him because God cannot be a party to sin.  And so, He sent them away from His perfect creation and put cherubim to guard the entrance so they could not return.  But this was not the original plan of God.  Man had altered that plan and had changed the perfect to the imperfect.  Never again would this type of relationship occur.  But God was not done with man.  God had created another way for man to have an intimate relationship with him.  And that was thru the birth, death, and resurrection of His son, Jesus Christ.

 

Let the Punishment Fit the Crime.

As a young child, I remember misbehaving and having my mother pronounce punishment for whatever “crime” I had committed against childhood humanity.  I used to think, at times, that her punishment was unjust and didn’t fit my offense.  And along those same lines, the punishment given to Adam and Eve certainly didn’t fit their offense.

After they had eaten from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, the Bible states that the eyes of both of them were opened – opened to the realities that there were dark forces in the world to counter the goodness they had only known from God.  Opened to their human condition and the world in which they lived.  And opened to the fact that they had disobeyed God, and He would find out. It almost paints a picture of  a childlike existence in the Garden until they had eaten the fruit and their eyes were opened, doesn’t it?

0E047C61-A822-4738-91B6-F07AF6D5AAFCBut because of their disobedience, God pronounces judgement.  He could have simply destroyed them and started over with the creation of human beings.  But God does not do that, even though their disobedience certainly warranted death.  Do you notice that He does not start with the woman who was the first one to disobey Him?  He starts with the serpent.  And the words He uses are, “Because you have done this”, done what you might ask?  The serpent had tempted Eve in her naïveté.  When Satan entered the serpent, he did not go and tempt the man.  The man had the direct command of God and knew exactly what God had told him. However, the woman did not.  She had heard the command from man and when the serpent played on the words, she didn’t know the exact truth.  Therefore, since the serpent went against God’s command for established humanity, God not only changes the physical appearance of the serpent, but He adds to the punishment of the serpent the eternal damnation that would be coming to him in the future.  And the very woman that he tricked would produce generations of people from which Jesus Christ would come.  Notice God says, “And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush you head and you will strike his heel.”  So the descendent of the woman, Jesus Christ, would deal a death blow to Satan and that best that Satan would do would be to organize events to culminate with Christ’s death upon the cross.  But little did he know that very act would bring about salvation for all of mankind whom the serpent had desired to see fall short of God’s grace and enter into eternal damnation with his trickery.

And to the woman, God adds no scolding at the beginning, as He did for the serpent, and as He would do to the man.  He simply pronounces judgement on her and  woman’s punishment speaks of her very function – childbirth.  God increased the pains that she was going to experience and gave her an internal struggle that would always cause her to want to rule over her husband, kind of like she did in the garden.  However, God would never allow woman to rule man again, although there would always be an internal desire to do so.

But for Adam God offers an additional scolding, “Because you listened to your wife and ate from the tree which I commanded you, ‘You must not eat of it’…God is telling Adam that he should have known better because he had received the direct command from God Himself.  And that no matter what the woman said, Adam should not have listened to her.  So God curses the very function of man – which was labor.  And then He introduced the death factor, “By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you return to the ground, since from it you were taken; for dust you are and to dust you will return.”

Up to this point there had been no death.  And the very thing which God had told Adam at the beginning was now going to come to pass – “but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die.” And it wasn’t just man who would die.  Animals were also affected.  The animals that had done nothing wrong were now under the curse because of man’s sin.  And the first to animals to die would be used for their skin to cover the nakedness of the man and the woman.

And so, as in many sins, there were innocent victims. Victims who had done nothing to deserve their punishment and had committed no crime.

Who Ate the Forbidden Fruit?

83F1B7A3-2062-4937-B912-BF8E9FC8B907One of the most talked about occurences in the Bible is when “Eve” ate the forbidden fruit.  Pretty much everyone knows that story.   But the part I find very interesting is that Adam was with her there in the Garden at the tree, and Adam was as big a part of the sin as she was.

As you recall, God made Adam first.  And after creating Adam, God gave a command to him saying, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it, you will surely die.”   So isn’t it interesting that here they are, Adam and Eve, in the middle of the Garden, next to the tree that God said to stay away from?  And here is Eve, having a conversation with a serpent.   And here is Adam nearby.  You know Adam was nearby, because the Bible tells us that he was with her.  And here at the tree, is a serpent talking to the woman – that same woman that Adam was supposed to love and protect, and yet Adam does nothing.  It’s not like there was city traffic to drown out the conversation. He heard it.  But Adam never corrects the serpent when he is falsely telling Eve that she would not die, which was completely contrary to what God had told him.  As a matter of fact, Adam does nothing but willingly join her in her sin.

If you look further into the man and his behavior over in Chapter Three verse twelve of Genesis,  we see God in the Garden calling to Adam, not to Eve.  When Adam explains he was hiding because he was naked, God asks Adam a question.  He says, “Have YOU eaten from the tree that I commanded YOU not to eat from?”  Then Adam, still not protecting his wife or taking any kind of responsibility, blames not just Eve, but he blames God.   He says, “The woman YOU put here with me – SHE gave me some fruit from the tree and I ate it.”

See, Adam is given a woman as a suitable helper for him, specifically created by God.  Adam is so happy with the woman he says, “This is now bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh, she shall be called woman, for she was taken out of man.”  Then God gives Adam a command, “Don’t eat from that tree.” (Paraphrased).  ADAM was the person God directed the command to.  So Adam must have told Eve, because she acknowledges she knew the “rules” when she is having her conversation with the Serpent.  Then God asks ADAM a question, “Have you done what I told you not to?” (Paraphrased), and Adam turns the tables on BOTH God and Eve.  Do you see that?

If I could take liberty with his words, he is, in effect, saying, “Well, partly this is your fault, God.  I mean, after all, YOU are the one who put her here with me.  I really didn’t have a say in the matter.  Then SHE deceived me and gave me some fruit.  You see, I had no idea where she got the fruit from, so I ate it.  So I am not at fault in any way here.”  But Adam did know where she got the fruit.  He knew the entire time.  He was with her.  He did not intervene to stop the sequence of events.  He did not own up to his sin.  He did not obey God.  That is why God punishes Adam.  Because he was no better than Eve.

So the next time someone blames Eve for the fall of humanity, remind them who was supposed to be her protector.  Remind them who was with her.  Remind them that it was both Adam and Eve who disobeyed God.  Adam was not dragged along a road.  He walked down it willingly and knowingly.  It was him and his disobedience along with Eve’s disobedience that led to the fall of humanity that fateful day in the Garden of Eden.

 

 

 

Bone of my Bone, Flesh of my Flesh

The creation of Eve calls into question why God chose to make her from Adam’s flesh, when He could just have easily created her in the same manner in which He created Adam – from the dust of the ground. How is it that the creation accounts of Adam and Eve are so very different, yet the Creator is the same?

Looking at the verses in Chapter 2: 18-20, we see that Adam was busy naming the animals that God had caused to come to him after He formed them out of the ground. Did you catch that?  Did you catch that God formed the animals in the same manner in which He formed Adam – from the ground?  And although God formed C9B1223D-E781-4A66-AD49-49DA315DF24Bthe animals from the ground, the Bible never tells us that ‘He breathed into their nostrils the breath of life and they became a living being’ , as it does for the Creation of Adam.  So what gave the animals their life?  The Bible doesn’t say.  It simply says they were formed from the ground, and as living creatures, they were brought to Adam for him to name them.  So God could have breathed into them, or He could have caused life to come into them in another way.  We simply don’t know.

But what does it say about Eve? Is the Bible telling us that her creation was somehow inferior since she was not formed in the same unique and creative manner as Adam and the animals?  Far from it.  When a rib was taken from Adam to create Eve, God was using the very DNA from his best creation, His perfect creation of a human, and replicating that in the woman.  Yet, he was doing more than that.  He was showing the woman that without the man, she would not be in existence, and therefore, creating an order for the family.  Just as a woman is very protective of a baby that comes from her womb, I think that by creating woman from man, God was creating something for Adam to care for, love, and protect.  It was bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh.  Just as an infant is that to the mother and the bond of love in an unbreakable one.

The part of Genesis Chapter two that is most intriguing is in verse 24, when it states “for this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife…”  Why would this be here in this spot?  There were no fathers and mothers at this point.  In fact, if we believe the Creation account, there were no other beings on the face of the earth except for Adam and Eve.  And while I believe every word in the Bible is inspired from God,  there is also a human element to it.  And here is where I believe that is evident.   For how can it state anything about fathers and mothers, and leaving them to be with a wife? There had been no marriage?  Therefore, there could also be no wife.   There was simply man and there was simply woman.  The terminology of wife and marriage had not yet come.  And to me, the placement of that sentence here makes no logical sense because immediately after the statement, the writer turns his writing back to the creation saying, “the man and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame.”

Regardless of the reasons why the writer placed that there, this part of the Chapter is dedicated to woman being created to be a suitable helper for man.  And I think it is setting up the “fall” in the Garden of Eden, because as we will see next time, Adam is with Eve in the Garden when she eats of the fruit.  He did not intervene, did not protect her, in fact he joins her, and that is why God also punishes him.  And the animals?  Well they would also have to suffer because of man.

 

 

The Trees of Eden

7CF31595-F0BC-4C94-9A12-5680BFEA3EF0

 

Did you ever stop to think about the trees in the Garden of Eden?  We all hear about THE tree.  The one that Eve took fruit from and shared with Adam.  But what about the OTHER trees?

Take a look at Genesis Chapter 2: 9 – “And the Lord God made all kinds of trees grow out of the ground – trees that were pleasing to the eye and good for food.  In the middle of the garden were the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.”

Did you notice the adjectives that are used to describe the other trees:  pleasing and good.  Did you notice the placement in the Garden for the tree of the knowledge of good and evil and the tree of life?  Why do you suppose that God put these two trees in the middle of the Garden?  Why didn’t He place them in an obscure location, like maybe on a mountain?  Why did He make them so easily accessible?

I think it is very interesting that in order to get to the two trees in the middle of the Garden, Adam and Eve had to pass by all the other trees.  The ones that were pleasing to the eye and good for food.  In other words, those trees that they walked by were appealing to the humanness of the newly created man and woman.  They were beautiful trees to look at and enticing for nourishment.  There was no need for Adam and Eve to pass by them.  They could have stayed on any of the perimeters of the Garden and been satisfied for life.  But that isn’t what they did, is it?

Do you further notice that the Bible does not include the two trees along with the other trees when the words pleasing and good for food were used?  The Bible talks about the two trees separately.  I wonder why?  Were they not pleasing to the eye?  Hard to say.  Were they not good for food?  That I would say a definite no.  The food that was offered from these two trees was not food for physical nourishment, but a different kind of food. Food for wisdom, food for life, food that would lead to death.  These trees were never meant to be food for nourishment to the physical body.  These trees had other purposes, and obedience and free will were tied to them.

B8D2E817-FAD9-42DF-843F-B55AD4710DBENote that they co-existed in the center of the Garden.  I have always wondered –  why, after eating from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, did they not just turn quickly and eat of the fruit from the tree of life?  They knew that God had told them that they should not eat of  the tree of the knowledge of good and evil “for when you eat of it, you will surely die”, and if God had told them they would die, wouldn’t the next natural reaction be to eat the fruit from the other tree that would give them life?  The tree of life was so important that God, in Genesis Chapter 3:24, placed a cherubim with a flashing sword to guard it because He did not want Adam and Eve to partake of the tree after they had eaten from the other. But God did not do this until after he banished them from the Garden.  So they had time to eat from the tree of life.  So why did they not do it?

I further think that once they ate from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil they must have had some kind of a noticeable physical or mental change.  Why do I say this?  Because the Bible tells us in Genesis Chapter 3 verse 7 that “the eyes of both of them were opened and they realized they were naked”.  I think this could be a partial explanation as to why they didn’t just turn to eat from the tree of life.  I think they were frightened by the change they had just experienced.  I think they ran away in fear.  After all, God finds them hiding later that evening.  So I can only imagine that something interrupted the thought process that would have logically said, “eat from the tree of life and counteract the death that God said would happen.”  Or  maybe it was God who caused the “fruit” on the tree of life to shrivel up.  The Bible does not go into explanation.  But one thing is for certain.  When they ate from the tree that they were not supposed to eat from, it began the countdown to their death.  Life for them would never be the same.

 

 

 

 

The Creation of Man

Just writing the title for this Blog stirred in me all the scientific hub bub I have heard thru the years about how man came into being.  From the Big Bang creating the earth and seeding the planet for life, from fish leaving the water to live on dry land, to alien beings experimenting with animals to create a race of slave laborers.  I have heard quite a bit!  And I believe none of it.

It isn’t that I am just closed minded.  I look and listen to the other theories and there are just so many things that don’t have answers in order for me to believe it.  For example, how many fish have you seen in your lifetime that suddenly decide that it is time to stop swimming and crawl or swim up to shore, take a deep breathe of that rich oxygen atmosphere and begin a new life?  I am 51 years old and haven’t seen it happen in my lifetime.

Besides, if the fish did decide to do that, and if it were even possible for them to breath until their little fish lungs evolved to accept oxygenated air, how would they have procreated?  Did their entire body suddenly morph into the bodies we have today? Not likely, in fact, not even possible.  The human body is so complex in each and every area that we have doctors who specialize in one particular area and still say they don’t know about some things.  And take the issue of human procreation.  Do you know how many things have to go right and match up exactly in order for a child to come into existence?  In fact, it is surprising there are not more miscarriages.  If you ever really studied how life forms, it would change you evolutionary view forever.  Everything works together in such a way that there had to be order to the design.  The only way to have order is to have someone put things in order – a Creator.

So in Genesis Chapter 1 verses 26-31, we see God’s creation of man.

408213BD-455B-439C-A3F4-DB5B2B9ECCFE
Michelangelo – The Creation of Adam – Sistine Chapel

 

I want to focus on the first thirteen words in verse 26.  ‘Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, …”   Do you remember one of my earlier blogs when I wrote about Genesis Chapter 1 verse 3?  If not, I focused on the first three words, “And God Said….”  We know from that verse that God was speaking to be heard by someone.  He was not alone.  And here we see God saying, “Let US, make man in OUR image, in OUR likeness…”

Most scholars believe this is an indication of the Trinity being present at Creation.  Do you notice the template that God uses for His creation of man?  –   “OUR image, OUR likeness.”

You are the descendent of the first man, Adam, who was created as a replication of God’s image and God’s likeness.  In fact, you are a replication of that same image and same likeness.  So what is the “image”?  What is the “likeness” ? Many believe this  means that man possesses the elements of personality similar to those of God, such as thinking, feeling, and having a will, and that man has a moral nature, and is made up of a body, soul, and spirit.  Others believe that is refers to the physical attributes of man.  I think it is a combination of both.  But is this really a point of debate? Whatever God’s image and likeness is, is better than anything I could imagine or create on my own.

It doesn’t really matter to me which is actually correct, or if either are correct.  I am not sure in our finite minds that we can even understand the wisdom that had to go into the creation of man with all his intricate parts, both physically and mentally. I know that there is not one person, living or dead, that can take dust from the ground and created a living being.  We can take from a living being and create another living being, but we cannot take from the non living and create the living. The fact that is important to me is that I was created, in some form, from the template of a Holy God and that He caused me to come into being and breathed the breath of life into me as Genesis chapter 2 verse 7 states, “the Lord God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, AND man became a living being.”

This conjures up an image in my mind of doing CPR on someone who is non responsive and not breathing on their own.  You use your breathe to circulate and oxygenate their lungs.  You are helping to keep them alive.  But God’s breathe created the life.  It brought it to life.  And that is an awesome thought!

I will leave you with a little joke I heard once that puts things into perspective for me.

So man, in his arrogance, decided to challenge God because man did not believe that God could create a better human than him.  So they both decided to start from scratch and create the “perfect” man.  So God reached down and grabbed some dirt from the ground and man began to gather some dirt from the ground.  Then God said, “Wait a moment.  Go create your own dirt first!”